- Baseball Card History and Influence Committee - May 1, 2010
1. Encourage more interactive knowledge sharing about the history and importance of baseball cards as a representation of the game itself. This research will help document the link between the baseball card industry and the game's popularity.
Cards tell you a ton about the spread of baseball both geographically and culturally. According to Mint Condition, 19th century kids got hooked on tobacco baseball cards in advance of actual smoking. Pictures of sports stars, bathing beauties, and adventurers took collectors to worlds far beyond the everyday, so I can understand the attraction. (TV had a similar effect 50 years later and effectively forced the MLB into nationwide expansion.) I think the triune distractions of baseball, advertising, and picture cards grew together, inseparably.
2. Research the history of the relationship between statistics and baseball cards. (i.e. when baseball cards starting publishing RBI, Stolen Bases, etc.)
This seems a lot drier, since it's more certain when card makers added specific stats for the 1st time. I suppose it's still useful to compile an authoritative reference.
3. Provide a forum for discussion on the following aspects of the baseball card industry:
I. Memorable, important and famous series designs
II. The late 80s, early 90s influx of new card sets and limited edition inserts, and their effect on the hobby's health
III. Documentation on all of the major card companies and important figures in the evolution of the baseball card industry
IV. Research into the evolution of the game as viewed through the lens of baseball cards (batting gloves, player/managers, the DH, record-setting achievements, the steroids era, etc.)
II. The late 80s, early 90s influx of new card sets and limited edition inserts, and their effect on the hobby's health
III. Documentation on all of the major card companies and important figures in the evolution of the baseball card industry
IV. Research into the evolution of the game as viewed through the lens of baseball cards (batting gloves, player/managers, the DH, record-setting achievements, the steroids era, etc.)
Some of these are clear-but, others completely open to interpretation. Everyone knows the first guy to bat as DH was Yankee Ron Blomberg, right?
But wait, not so fast! Blomberg's the first to appear as a DH on the field, not to be tagged DH in a Topps set.
That's right, another first for big Frank. And is that a "I'm just talking 'bout Shaft!" expression or what?
What kind of things do you think the history committee should research or write about?
1974 Topps #117, Ron Blomberg |
But wait, not so fast! Blomberg's the first to appear as a DH on the field, not to be tagged DH in a Topps set.
1974 Topps #55, Frank Robinson |
That's right, another first for big Frank. And is that a "I'm just talking 'bout Shaft!" expression or what?
What kind of things do you think the history committee should research or write about?