Tuesday, February 19, 2019

1930s World Wide Gum and "Canadian Goudey"

Introduction (a.k.a. what you're in for, Oh Boy!)

Goudey Oh Boy! gum wrapper

This post looks at Goudey Gum's card business across their 1933-34 baseball peak and where its mojo went during an ensuing creative decline. I bounce between a bunch of 1930s sets published by Goudey Gum, World Wide Gum, and their competition to show what "Canadian Goudey" added to our hobby and seek new understanding of these old issues along the way.

Goudey sets mentioned
  • 1930s Goudey Indian Gum
  • 1930s Goudey Big League Gum
  • 1936-37 Goudey baseball premiums (R314)
  • 1939 Goudey "How To" baseball premiums (R303)
World Wide Gum sets
  • 1930s World Wide Gum Big League Gum
  • 1933 World Wide Gum Sea Raiders Gum
  • 1936-37 World Wide Gum baseball premiums (V352)
  • 1930s World Wide Gum Ice Kings hockey
Other sets
  • 1933 DeLong Play Ball Gum
  • 1934-36 National Chicle Diamond Stars Gum
  • 1934-36 National Chicle Batter-Up! Gum
  • 1937 O-Pee-Chee Baseball Stars
  • 1930s O-Pee-Chee Hockey Stars


Thanks in advance for reading! And that's my favorite 1933 Goudey card, #133 Joe Judge. What a graceful piece of work.

Five takeaways by the end
  1. Fan excitement around Chicago's 1933 All-Star Game spurred Goudey to pump tons of cards into that year's market
  2. Soon after a huge 1933, Goudey Gum bled their "card talent" away to American (and perhaps Canadian) competitors
  3. World Wide Gum (WWG) did more with trading cards than copy Goudey sets, and did it for longer
  4. WWG's 1936 baseball set is, in fact, a two-year (1936-37) release that "imported" Goudey's photo premiums as promotional support
  5. O-Pee-Chee, the same company who'd partner with Topps decades later, provided 1930s competition to WWG and both companies raised the bar for North American card makers despite the Great Depression

Canada and Goudey and "Canadian Goudey"

When you collect pre-WWII baseball sets, Canadian confectioner World Wide Gum (WWG) appears here and there along the journey, often linked to Goudey Gum. I first encountered it as "Canadian Goudey" in catalogs and online searches many years ago, which led me to cards like this.

1934 "Canadian Goudey" Big League Gum #54, Lefty Grove

Within the hobby, most treat them as one entity (Goudey Gum calling the shots and WWG as their Canadian subsidiary) for card-making and collecting purposes. I think it's more nuanced.

World Wide Gum in brief

While foremost a gum and candy company, WWG released several sport and non-sport card sets under that name between 1933 and 1950. They're best known for adapting Goudey's 1933 & 1934 Big League Gum baseball sets for Canadian distribution. Some print runs added French translation to card backs, like the Ruth below.

1933 WWG Big League Gum #93, Babe Ruth

As a collector, it took me awhile to consider WWG on its own. The phrase "Canadian Goudey" gets stuck in your head and yet oversimplifies the many things they created. Instead of focusing on them as Goudey's regional offshoot, there's more to say about why baseball fans in Canada wanted cards and where WWG's creative energy came from.

1933 WWG Sea Raider Gum #22, Montreal back variation

First off, "World Wide Gum" didn't mean Canada alone, at least not at first. One animal set (R78 Jungle Gum) placed WWG in Boston and R124/V359 Sea Raiders Gum (scans above and below) include back variations from both Boston and Montreal. Sea Raiders appears to be WWG's last that "straddled" our northern border and ensuing sets say "Printed in Canada."

1933 WWG Sea Raider Gum #3, Boston back variation

While World Wide Gum now stationed itself in Montreal, they didn't just adapt Goudey's designs like a Quebecois mimeograph. They went on to create some Canadian exclusives, including 1930s Ice Kings Gum (NHL hockey) and 1936-37 Big League Gum, a 135-card baseball set featuring both Major League and International League players. I dive into those later.

On a business level, WWG outlived Goudey Gum (RIP 1962) by more than a decade. You can find Canadian newspaper articles about WWG's candy business into the 1970s, showing longevity Goudey couldn't match.

1950 WWG Big League Stars #34, Toby Atwell

Goudey Gum drew the curtain on its card business in the late 1940s. WWG's last trading card set proved to be 1950 V362 Big League Stars, an International League issue produced without any apparent Goudey involvement.

Enos Goudey before baseball cards (1919-1932)

Goudey Gum's founder, Enos Goudey, moved to America from his native Nova Scotia in the 19th century and turned extensive manufacturing and candy-making experience into a successful business selling low-cost sweets -- even nicknamed The Penny Gum King of America -- by the 1920s. Of his many brands, Oh Boy! proved Goudey Gum's most enduring.

Oh Boy! wrapper - note Goudey's Boston & Chicago locations

Goudey Gum published one set of trading cards under this Oh Boy! name. It appears they worked around the destructive stickiness of 1920s-era gum recipes by selling their postcard-sized set from vending machines and store counters, not in commingled gum packs.

1929 E282 Oh Boy! gum, Tom Mix & Jack Dempsey (set checklist)

Jack Dempsey became Goudey's first on-card athlete, shown here training with actor Tom Mix for a boxing movie. This design's close to those produced by Exhibit Supply Co. of Chicago for several decades. Perhaps Exhibit's print facilities made these Oh Boy! cards via Goudey's Chicago connection? While their 1920s production details aren't known today, smaller card companies often designed sets in one office and contracted them out to a larger lithographer. Exhibit Supply could've fit the bill as its printer.

1920s Around the World gum wrapper

Enos Goudey released gum products under several corporate aliases during his time as company president and "52 Everett St." meant Goudey's Boston production facilities. World Wide Gum distributed several of these gum brands in Canada, so we know the companies shared a business relationship prior to trading cards, at least as gum partners.

Enos's extended relative Kenneth Goudey wrote his own account of Goudey's gum and card products, now available via Archive.org. Some of its dates and details don't match up to today's catalogs, as collectors and researchers continue to discover new info. (For much more about their pre-1933 era, see Prehistory of the Goudey Gum Company at Jasoncards.)

Based on my own recent research, I propose some updates for V355 Big League Gum later in this article.

Enos Goudey sells out, Goudey cards take off (1932-34)

Now in his late 60s, Enos sold Goudey Gum in 1932 to a family relative connected to the Corning manufacturing empire. I wonder if he felt motivated to exit the business and enjoy retirement by the sudden death of 70 year-old William Wrigley, Jr. -- titan of the gum business and owner of Chicago's Cubs -- in January of that year.

William Wrigley, Jr., founder of Wrigley Gum

Though Enos remained available as advisor to Goudey Gum, his successors deserve credit for making its card business take off. Recent gum formulations allowed for safer packaging with paper and their first hit came in early 1933 with Indian Gum cards. PSA profiles this set's nuances well and the company experimented with production and marketing approaches soon used in baseball sets, such as gap numbering, in-store wrapper exchanges, and mail-in add-ons.

1933 Goudey Indian Gum, #52 Davy Crockett

Indian Gum back designs echo competing non-sport sets like R139 "Soldier Cards" and R114 "American Heroes," both from other New England companies. It's hard to know who "invented" this back layout, as almost all sets of the era used it.

Note that PSA and others differ over Indian Gum's launch date, 1932 vs. 1933. An original Goudey collector recalled it as the "fall of 1932" in his 1970 notes on buying their sets. Every Big League Gum card notes "...by the originators of Indian Gum" on the back, so we know it came second.

1933 Big League Gum backs cite Indian Gum by name from the start

With Big League Gum hitting the streets in April, logic pushes Indian Gum back to sometime earlier. The FTC changed a relevant trade law in January 1933, so I like February as its release date.

Goudey Gum's first two series of Big League Gum baseball (48 total, #1-52 with gap at #41-44) sold fast. I think they realized hype leading up to Chicago's "Game of the Century," which we now call the first AL/NL All-Star game, could drive sales for anything baseball-related. (Recall Goudey's Chicago connection, which could've been extra motivation.)

1933 "Century of Progress" All-Star Game scorecard

As reflected (in part) by his four 1933 Big League Gum cards, Babe Ruth remained the sport's top draw, and I've already written about Goudey featuring him on their All-Star redemption promos.

All-Star Aside: Star-laden "benefit baseball games" already existed in the mold of 1911's Addie Joss game. Chicago's 1933 game added something new: nationwide fan voting for starting rosters via newspaper-printed, mail-in ballot. (Read MLB.com's "All-Star fan vote has storied history" for how that worked, kind of.) American and National Leagues canceled their games scheduled for July 6, more-or-less "blessing" that game date and freeing all elected players to participate.

1933 World's Fair event ticket

Chicago linked this "Game of the Century" to its 1933-34 Century of Progress World's Fair. Its nationwide wave of pregame hype proved a turning point for modern All-Star Games as public spectacle and baseball players as product pitchmen.

New York Times contemporary headline for 1933's All-Star Game

How much did Goudey benefit from tying itself to that hype? Reviewing their annual baseball card revenue, most of it from Big League Gum, always feels relevant. (See also my articles about Goudey's use of Ruth (1933) and Gehrig (1934) to promote Big League Gum and Lou Gehrig as Knot Hole League club spokesman.)

Goudey card and gum sales data via Bob Lemke

1933 sales alone would exceed $23 million in today's money. It's not clear whether Goudey's revenue covered products sold by partners (e.g., World Wide Gum). It should include their non-sport sets like Indian Gum. However you count it, their rush of cash meant changes for employees and competition alike.

How World Wide Gum handled Big League Gum

Goudey's first Big League Gum set, with 239 cards sold in 1933, stood out as our hobby's biggest since tobacco companies stopped pairing cigarettes and cards in 1911. Their last 24-card series came out following New York's Series win, featuring twelve world champion Giants and twelve AL pennant-winning Washington Senators. Here's the order of all ten Goudey sheets.

33goudey_table3

Thanks to Kevin Glew's set summary at PSA for this sheet breakdown and Jasoncards' Minor Leaguers of the 1933 Goudey set for details about Goudey's 15 International League players, which included Montreal's own Curley Ogden on sheet seven.

1933 Goudey Big League Gum #174, Curley Ogden, Montreal Royals

World Wide Gum adapted 1933 Big League Gum for Canada from a subset of Goudey's American-made sheets. They had the opportunity to use International League players who'd be familiar to Montreal Royals and Toronto Maple Leafs fans. Alas, WWG built its Big League Gum from four Goudey series (1, 2 3, and 6) that didn't contain any minor leaguers, so no Toronto and no Montreal, at least not in 1933 gum packs.

WWG's first two Canadian sheets split #1-48 in half. If you're feeling flush, BMWCards will sell you the second one.

WWG Big League Gum second sheet, mix of #6-40

World Wide Gum's use of Goudey's sheet six and a reduction in extra-printed Ruth cards meant renumbering about half the Canadian set compared to America's version, so collectors of both will notice differences. Read Jason's An alternate history of 1933 Goudey for good thoughts on how that happened.

WWG's third sheet, with Gehrig at #55, sold at REA in 2015.

WWG Big League Gum third sheet, #41-72

WWG's fourth sheet with extra-printed #80 Ruth and #55 Gehrig cards, sold by REA in 2013.

WWG Big League Gum fourth sheet, #73-94, w/extra #55 Gehrig & #80 Ruth

I bet World Wide Gum created its four-sheet Big League Gum set before All-Star Game hype reached its fever pitch. While Goudey went on to ride that wave through another six sheets of players in America, WWG switched to designing their 72-card 1933-34 V357 Ice Kings Gum hockey set, a Canadian exclusive. Based on dates for that year's NHL season (November 1933 to April 1934), Ice Kings went to printers by October at the latest.

1933-34 WWG Ice Kings Gum, uncut sheet
Ice Kings Gum #44, Normie Himes (English only back)

So why end WWG's baseball after four sheets? It seems straightforward, if (as a new-ish card seller) they could produce just one set at a time. Canadians do love their hockey, so it made sense to get NHL cards ready to go.

Back in the USA: Post-1933 brain drain at Goudey

For two full years, Goudey did great artistic work on Big League GumSport Kings Gum, and other non-sport sets. Then their card creativity fell off the table. From 1935 on, it's just repeated images from 1933 and 1934 sets, a shift to black-and-white, and ever-cheaper production. Where did their artistry go?

1933 Big League Gum, a thing of beauty
1935 Big League Gum, a thing of mimicry
1936 Big League Gum, aka, "The Grey Depression"
1936 R314 premiums, thin of paper and low on cost

I think Goudey lost both its talent and a need for baseball card innovation. Recall that Enos Goudey sold his business in 1932. When founders sell, executives often leave with their personal proceeds and other employees change jobs to avoid conflicts with new ownership. Goudey treasurer Harold DeLong, for example, created his own gum label and used it to release this 24-card baseball set in late 1933.

1933 DeLong Play Ball Gum #7, Lou Gehrig

While a minor set by size and collector interest, DeLong Gum's back design provides a missing link to the better-known 1934 Diamond Stars Gum set. Recognize that "Austen Lake" byline?

1934-36 National Chicle Diamond Stars Gum #8, Joe Vosmik (back)

Goudey's new competition, National Chicle, signed Austen Lake to write their Diamond Stars Gum card backs, less than one year removed from his work on DeLong Gum.

How did National Chicle itself get off the ground? In late 1933, ex-Goudey man Alvin Livingstone led a group of fellow former employees to found a gum card business under that new company name.

An MIT business student interviewed Alvin not long after they started up and asked about his approach to market research, with cagey results.


I'm not sure we can prove whether Goudey's card artists followed Livingstone to National Chicle. Based on the excellent artwork on Sky Birds Gum and Diamond Stars Gum sets, I think it likely.

1934 National Chicle Sky Birds Gum #43, Juan de la Cierva
1934-36 National Chicle Diamond Stars Gum #44, Rogers Hornsby

Even National Chicle's photographic set, Batter-Up Gum, went the extra mile by adding a die-cut, stand-up panel cut to each player's silhouette.

1934 National Chicle Batter-Up Gum #31, Lefty Grove

Compare this to Goudey's reuse of 1933-34 card images for 1935's 4-in-1 version of Big League Gum. Not a great card to unwrap if you're hoping for pictures you haven't seen before.

1935 Goudey Big League Gum, all 1933-34 retreads

Goudey itself more than doubled gum revenue from 1933 to 1935, while baseball revenue dropped to a fraction of its 1933 peak. In addition to losing creative talent to DeLong and National Chicle, their market perspective seemed to change. I imagine them questioning whether they needed to keep making so many cards when gum alone sold so well.


While Goudey's fortunes changed in America, interest continued to bubble up north. Let's return to World Wide Gum and its own competitive challenges.

The Canada dilemma: hockey first, hockey second, and baseball third

Even before Goudey Gum threw down with National Chicle in 1934, World Wide Gum faced off against another card maker known to most modern collectors: O-Pee-Chee. The same company who'd partner on baseball with Topps decades later first entered Canada's hockey card market, when both OPC and WWG produced NHL sets for 1933-34.

World Wide Gum's effort featured tinted photos and superior posing.

1933-34 WWG Ice Kings Gum #5, Earl Robinson

O-Pee-Chee's set took a more "school yearbook" approach. So yearbook-y they created albums to store and display your hockey heroes.

1933-34 OPC Hockey Star Gum #23, Howie Morenz
OPC Hockey Star Gum album for #1-72

While WWG took a break after that first year of Ice Kings, OPC persisted, adding another 24-48 cards each successive NHL season. Their five series catalog as V304-A (1933-34) to V304-E (1937-38). All OPC hockey albums I've seen hold 72 cards, so would've come out after V304-B. Here's their full Hockey Stars Gum wrapper lineup.


On the business side of things, O-Pee-Chee's Wikipedia page says they "operated mainly at a loss during the Depression." Economic woes could explain why WWG itself dropped hockey between 1934 and 1937, while OPC continued to soldier on, despite an uncertain future.

1936 divergence for American and Canadian Big League Gum

Stateside, Goudey released a pair of lower-cost 1936 sets, Big League Gum "game backs" (25 players, cataloged R322) and R314 premiums (~200 players, larger photos on thinner paper).

1936 Goudey Big League Gum (R322), when mediocre cards happen to good players

Goudey cropped all their R322s from identical, larger R314 images. Kids bought gum packs and swapped their empty wrappers for an R314 premium in the store itself. Not sure how pleased kids would be to get some of those same pictures twice.

Based on available quantities in our hobby today, I think Goudey scuttled R322 card production mid-year, yet continued to offer R314 premiums in shops for some time after. Eagle-eyed collectors can break this "R314" set down further.

R314 premiums, with "Litho in U.S.A." - Type 1

While some catalogs delineate up to five "R314" subsets, I agree with Prewarcards.com at least two (and perhaps four) of those types belong under V352 as World Wide Gum issues. Anything lacking "Litho in U.S.A." appears fair game for Canada-only or shared American/Canadian distribution.

R314 Type 2 (V352?) premium, no "Litho in U.S.A"
R314 Type 3 (V352?) "borderless" premium
R314 Type 4 (V352?) "creamy" premium (no "litho in U.S.A.")
R314 Type 5 (V352?) premium (dull finish, no "litho in U.S.A.")

If you search for R314/V352 information, not everyone agrees on its number of "sets" (based on design and print differences), number of cards in each set, and country of origin. Still room to improve what we know on this one.

R314/V352 checklists that share common ground vary in one important way. Types 1-4 contain exclusively major leaguers. Type 5's checklist contains Detroit Tigers and International League players, implying targeted distribution to stores near those fan bases. (Some say Type 5 doesn't contain Tigers, which tells you a little about trying to sort out subtle details from the 1930s.)

I think just as Goudey printed R314 premiums to support 1930s Big League Gum sales in the USA, WWG used these non-USA premiums to support their own set of MLB and International League players. Let's check that out now.

1936-37 WWG Big League Gum (V355): Years in the making

Starting in 1936, Canadian fans received what Americans hadn't since 1934: a sizable set of new baseball card photos, albeit sans colour.

1936-37 WWG Big League Gum #101, Vito "Lefty" Tamulis

Most catalogs date V355 Big League Gum as 1936, which tells just half the story. If you read its card backs in detail, WWG wrote 20+ cards based on events during or after the 1936 season. (You can check my card-by-card work in TradingCardDB's set gallery.) As one example, #76 Vosmik says, "Traded to St. Louis by Cleveland early in 1937."

1936-37 WWG Big League Gum #76, Joe Vosmik

When I rule the world, card catalogs will call this a 1936-37 set, just as they date multi-year efforts like National Chicle's Diamond Stars Gum and Batter-Up Gum to 1934-36. They all published cards across more than one year.

"At the close of last season..." means 1935

Card backs also imply WWG planned from the start for a two-part, two-year release. Some "high-number" cards (for example, #131 Al Lopez) refer to 1935 events as "last season," so would've come out, or been written to come out, in 1936. As mentioned above, more than 20 cards refer to late 1936 events, so at least one series, and perhaps two, hit the streets in 1937.

World Wide Gum appears to have matched Goudey's 1933 scattershot approach by leaving unissued "early" gaps (at least five within #1-100) that they filled in 1937. To put it another way, #76 Vosmik and a handful of others hit stores far from their adjacent numbers. (See this article's appendix for relevant card-by-card notes.)

1936-37 WWG Big League Gum wrapper

World Wide Gum wrappers asked collectors to "Start saving Cards of American, National and International League Players until your series are completed." Sneaky stuff, when they know you can't complete their numerical run until 1937.

That wrapper text does show a benefit of WWG's Canada-only release: International League players get equal mention alongside AL and NL stars. (I bet "EXTRA VALUE" referred to how kids exchanged empty wrappers for the various R314/V352 photo premiums shown earlier.)

1936-37 WWG Big League Gum #135, Philip Weintraub

A single (purported) 1936-37 short print exists, #135 Philip Weintraub, with no clear explanation for its scarcity. As the set's last card, print difficulties with his sheet location could've damaged available cards. WWG might've also found reason to pull his card partway through distribution. PSA's graded twenty #135 examples, so it's not unheard of to locate, just pricy when you do.

Why and how 1936-37 WWG Big League Gum came to be

World Wide Gum designed its cards in Quebec, so I think local baseball events figure in its creation. In 1935, Frank "Shag" O'Shaughnessy managed their Montreal Royals to the International League playoffs. Despite Montreal's title loss to New York rivals Syracuse, we'd expect local baseball interest to hit its highest point in several years.

1936-37 WWG Big League Gum #76, Shag Shaughnessy

Shag's own card came out following his mid-1936 move from Montreal manager to the IL President's office. As part of a lifelong connection to sports, he'd earlier invented the eponymous Shaughnessy playoff system, implemented by the International League and still used in various leagues and sports around the world.


As mentioned earlier, WWG's 1933 and 1934 baseball sets stopped short of including Canadian (International League) minor leaguers, perhaps in deference to their upcoming Ice Kings Gum hockey set. This 1936-37 set didn't miss that opportunity and included 26 International Leaguers, 14 of those from Montreal alone. I think local representation went beyond Big League Gum itself.

Lot of 1937 R314/V352 Premiums, as auctioned in 2018

Remember one R314/V352 premium ("R314 Type 5," shown above) contains International League players. It's almost certain Canadian candy stores used them as a wrapper swap bonus for 1937's Big League Gum packs.

While we've uncovered this set's (two) years of issue, its print layout remains a mystery. Unlike 1933 and 1934 Big League Gum, no 1936-37 uncut sheets exist in the hobby today, so we might never know for sure. Lacking better info, I propose one of these options.
  • Nine 3x5 sheets = 135 players, no double-prints
  • Six 4x6 sheets = 135 players, nine double-prints
  • Five 5x6 sheets = 135 players, fifteen double-prints

Goudey and WWG used 4x6 sheets for many other sets, so I give an edge to that one and its double-prints.

1936-37 WWG #96, Lou Gehrig

1936-37 remains so scarce, it's hard to prove who WWG would extra-print. Lou Gehrig, perhaps? PSA's V355 population report contains less than ten registered cards for many numbers and I'd like more data to draw conclusions.

We already know Goudey lost card talent to DeLong and National Chicle after 1933. For those willing to move north, World Wide Gum represents another potential landing spot and, with some evidence, I think so did O-Pee-Chee.

1936-37-38: WWG and OPC, together again

O-Pee-Chee's hockey sets didn't remain static, even as they had a market more-or-less to themselves after World Wide Gum stepped back from Ice Kings Gum. If you like 1934-36 Batter-Up Gum like I do, you'll recognize a feature of this OPC 1936-37 Hockey Stars set.

1936-37 O-Pee-Chee Hockey Stars #118, Eddie Shore

To refresh our brains and eyes, here's 1934-36 National Chicle Batter-Up again, sporting a similar haircut die-cut, so kids could fold it down and stand their players.
1934 National Chicle Batter-Up Gum #31, Lefty Grove

O-Pee-Chee didn't use a die-cut by accident, as it reappeared on their 40-card 1937 baseball set, catalogued V300, whose players all hail from the American League. I think the lack of NL players implies OPC targeted sales to Canadian fans of Detroit, where the Tigers played just AL opponents. (It's also possible they considered a follow-up NL series that never materialized.)



1937 O-Pee-Chee Baseball Stars #109, Wally Moses

Since we now know World Wide Gum published part of its Big League Gum set in 1937, this again made them direct competitors to OPC. Back in 1933, WWG followed their baseball set with 1933-34 Ice Kings hockey. History repeated itself with this lookalike, 135-player set (catalogued V356) for the NHL 1937-38 season. It's heavy on close-up portraits and full of names with long-term significance.

1937-38 WWG hockey #95, Connie Smythe (e.g., Stanley Cup MVP award)

World Wide Gum's hockey set echos all the key elements of 1936-37 Big League Gum, except a company byline. Why WWG left its name off card backs qualifies as a minor mystery and, lacking wrappers to work from, I'm not sure how they packaged and advertised this specific issue.

O-Pee-Chee's 1930s hockey sets skated on uninterrupted, reaching series V304-E by 1937-38, so they once again competed with World Wide Gum for NHL fans that year.

1937-38 OPC Hockey Stars #154, Johnny Gagnon

I enjoy the geometry of that blue-on-grey design and it's a nice step up from WWG's staid black-and-white portraits. If you're choosing baseball and hockey sets to collect by look alone, OPC outdid their competition twice.

Die-cutting it up north

While there's no clear business agreement linking National Chicle's Batter-Up Gum design to O-Pee-Chee's use of die-cuts in their 1936-37 hockey and 1937 baseball sets, you can see the path of inspiration. This raises the question: are we're looking at cross-industry influence or something more direct?

1937 OPC Baseball Stars Gum #120, Bob Feller (RC)

My theory's Chicle sold their die-cut designs to OPC outright in 1936 to raise some cash and stave off financial collapse. It's notable, at least to me, that after Goudey Gum acquired National Chicle's post-bankruptcy "remainders" in early 1937, some Chicle designs reappeared under the Goudey name over the next two years. None of those American retreads included die-cuts, while O-Pee-Chee produced both hockey and baseball sets with a fold-down flap in the same time frame.

Summary of what this means so far

"Canadian Goudey" turns out to be a big umbrella once opened! We've now seen connections and divergence between quite a few 1930s sets, thanks to an array of Goudey Gum's own work and spreading North American influence. I'm going to push its envelope a bit further by showing what Goudey recycled from National Chicle after their 1937 bankruptcy sale to try and explain how World Wide Gum reappeared in Boston not long after.

1936 National Chicle "How to..." folding booklets (R344)

Rabbit Maranville spent multiple stints in Boston and finished his long MLB career there in 1935. I think his local stature and connections made Rabbit an easy choice for Chicle's set of "how to" booklets inserted in 1936 packs of Batter-Up Gum. More germane to our Goudey discussion, his advice reappeared on backs of 1939 R303 premiums, about two years after National Chicle's bankruptcy.

Set of R303-B "how to" backs from 2014 auction

Using these on R303s gave Goudey baseball content without needing to create something new and they even dropped Rabbit's name, saving any endorsement fees.

My next image represents an enigma, isn't well-known to the hobby, and remains open to theories. It's a Diamond Stars Gum penny wrapper with World Wide Gum of Boston's name attached. American, Canadian, and competitive worlds collide!

World Wide Gum (Boston, MA) Diamond Stars Gum wrapper

Since we've looked at a lot of surrounding 1930s circumstances by now, I propose this to explain this wrapper's existence.

  • Goudey's purchase of National Chicle's remainders included some quantity of printed, unsold 1934-36 Diamond Stars Gum cards and existing distribution contracts.
  • Rather than throw away existing stock and potential revenue, Goudey resurrected World Wide Gum's American entity, printed these simple wrappers, and sold Chicle's leftover cards in them. 
  • This allowed simultaneous sale of both 1938 Big League Gum and leftover Diamond Stars Gum without using the Goudey name twice.
  • Buyers exchanged these wrappers for R303 "how to" premiums, explaining why they call out "Diamond Stars Gum" on their backs.

As I've never seen this World Wide Gum Diamond Stars wrapper addressed in detail, alternate theories and timelines are welcome!

Wrapping up Canada, Goudey, and "Canadian Goudey"

Thanks for sticking with me to the end, as it's the most I've written about Goudey, World Wide Gum, and their 1930s competition. (At least, so far.) By this point, don't feel bad if your brain's dripping out your ears in a surreal, vintage, colorful way.


While there's a lot more to say about each company's card sets and corporate histories, I hope you picked up several new things that help fit them all together. Let's look at the takeaways again.
  1. Fan excitement around Chicago's 1933 All-Star Game? It was there, in spades.
  2. Goudey Gum's 1933 card-making talent? For explicable business reasons, it left and became Goudey's own competition.
  3. World Wide Gum's contributions to trading cards? They went well beyond 1933 Goudey mimicry. Now that you know, I hope I don't need to start competing with you all to find beat up 1937 hockey cards.
  4. WWG's "1936" baseball set? It's in fact a two-year, 1936-37 release.
  5. O-Pee-Chee's role in all this? They published innovative sets during a poor economy and pushed against WWG in both baseball and hockey. Their prewar cards deserve more attention than they get.

Despite all that mid-1930s drama within our gum card industry, the decade ended a lot like like it started, with Goudey surviving multiple challenges at candy store counters, and coming out ahead of (or at least surviving) the Great Depression.

1939 Goudey Action Gum #5, Offshore Air Patrol

While outside the scope of this sports write-up, 1939 marked the significant escalation of World War II and Goudey Gum turned its card making interest to wartime sets. See SkyTamer.com's Action Gum gallery for a great look at where they went next.

Next time: Origins of 1938 Goudey Big League Gum

Now that we've worked through several years of international, competitive card-making, my next project's to write more about twelve months where Goudey found itself as, once again, the only game in town. That would be 1938.

1938 Big League Gum print sheet, #241-264

As an extra lagniappe for the detail-minded, here's my exciting appendix of World Wide Gum research!

--------------------------------------------------------------

APPENDIX: Card-by-card notes from TradingCardDB's 1936 WWG gallery

I flipped through available card backs, noted its latest year or event mentioned, and used them to help organize the 1936-37 World Wide Gum Big League Gum set.

1936-37 WWG #105, Stan Hack and a 1935 World Series mention

Possible 1936 cards, based on 1935 references
  • #23 Schumacher - "...longest consecutive winning streak among NL flingers in 1935"
  • #26 Myatt - "...with the New York Giants in 1935"
  • #28 Ripple - "Played on Dizzy Dean's All-Stars following 1935..."
  • #33 Bridges - "Starred in the last two World Series" (1934-35)
  • #35 Berger - Let NL in HR in 1935
  • #36 Castleman - "...early in 1935"
  • #37 Bartell - "...to the Giants in 1935"
  • #43 Goslin - "...won the 1935 World Championship"
  • #44 Rowe - "...outstanding hurler in the last two World Series" (1934-35)
  • #46 Cronin - "...signed Cronin for Pittsburgh in 1935."
  • #47 Foxx - "...acquired from the Philadelphia Athletics last winter in another deal." (1935)
  • #49 Gelbert - "His return to the Cardinals in 1935..."
  • #51 DiMaggio - "...in 1935, hit .398"
  • #54 Caravetta - "...step into Grimm's brogans in 1935."
  • #55 Cuyler - "...joining the Reds in 1935."
  • #58 Marcum - "...went to the Red Sox last winter..." (1935)
  • #59 Whitehead - "...Cards to the Giants last November..." (1935)
  • #62 Sewell - "...member of the White Sox in 1935."
  • #67 O'Neill - "...toward the close of 1935."
  • #69 Owen - "...swell job against the Cubs." (1935 World Series)
  • #73 Manush - "...revamping his battlefront for 1936..."
  • #75 Medwick - "He saw action in 154 championship games in 1935."
  • #78 Shaughnessy - "...the latter in 1935."
  • #89 Grimm - "...in 1935 to win the flag."
  • #96 Gehrig - "...scored the most runs in 1935."
  • #97 Jurges - "...in the world's series, 1935, was .296."
  • #100 Warneke - "...slab aces of the 1935 World Series."
  • #104 Lawson - "...splitting the 1935 season..."
  • #105 Hack - "...World Series average in 1935 was .227."
  • #106 Galan - "...Led the NL in runs scored and stolen base for 1935."
  • #109 Lee - "...in 1934-35 he played for Chicago Cubs."
  • #126 Benny Bates - "1934-35 with Beaumont and from there he was sold to Montreal."
  • #127 George Puccinelli - "Batted .359 with Orioles in 1935."
  • #130 - Bucky Harris - "...returning in 1935 to boss the Capitol city troupe."
  • #131 - Al Lopez - "At the close of last season, Al was turned over to Boston in one of those deals." (Dec 12, 1935)
  • #132 - Buddy Myer - "1935 batting champion of the AL."

Possible 1937 cards, based on mentions of 1936 and 1937
  1. #6 Vaughan - "He played for Pittsburgh 32 - 33 - 34 - 36." Could be typo for 35.
  2. #27 Seeds - "Sold to...Yankees on August 22, 1936. Played in the last World Series." (1936)
  3. #65 Lindstrom - "...with the Dodgers for 1936..."
  4. #76 Vosmik - "Traded to St. Louis by Cleveland early in 1937." (Jan, StL Browns team updated)
  5. #79 - Smythe (Royals) - "...August 5, 1936"
  6. #100 Warneke - "...recently traded by the Cubs." (Oct 8, 1936)
  7. #111 Reiber - "...played for Montreal during 1936."
  8. #116 Marvin Duke - "...part payment for Bob Seeds." (August 22, 1936)
  9. #120 Norm Kies - "...deal for Bob Seeds." (August 22, 1936)
  10. #121 Hal King - "Bought by Orioles from Montreal close 1936 season."
  11. #122 Tom Abernathy - "Trials with Phils, 1936."
  12. #123 Phil Hensiek - "...from Montreal in the season of 1936."
  13. #124 Ray Schalk - "Managed Buffalo club, IL champions, 1936."
  14. #125 Paul Dunlap - "Binghamton of NY-Penn League in 1936."
  15. #128 - Stevie Stephenson - "1936 with the Chicago NL club." (Current team listed as Montreal Royals, where he played in 1937)
  16. #129 - Rabbit Maranville MGR - "Signed to manage Montreal Royals, October, 1936."
  17. #134 - Estel Crabtree - "...sixth in the IL with an average of .346 last year." (1936)
  18. #135 - Phil Weintraub - "...second in the IL batting honors, with an average of .371 for 1936."

International League player cards
  1. #27 - Bob Seeds - Newark
  2. #78 - Shaughnessy, President of IL
  3. #79 - Smythe (Royals)
  4. #80 - Tate (Royals)
  5. #81 - Rhiel (Royals)
  6. #82 - Myllykangas (Royals)
  7. #83 - Sankey (Royals)
  8. #84 - Polli (Royals)
  9. #96 - Jolley (Albany Senators)
  10. #115 - Bob O'Farrell - Rochester Red Wings
  11. #116 - Marvin Duke - Montreal Royals
  12. #117 - Paul Florence - Baltimore Orioles
  13. #118 - John Berly UER - Toronto Maple Leafs
  14. #119 - Tom Oliver - Toronto Maple Leafs
  15. #120 - Norm Kies - Montreal Royals
  16. #121 - Hal King - Baltimore Orioles
  17. #122 - Tom Abernathy - Baltimore Orioles
  18. #123 - Phil Hensiek - Montreal Royals
  19. #124 - Ray Schalk - Buffalo Bisons
  20. #125 - Paul Dunlap - Montreal Royals
  21. #126 - Benny Bates - Montreal Royals
  22. #127 - George Puccinelli - Baltimore Orioles
  23. #128 - Stevie Stephenson - Montreal Royals
  24. #129 - Rabbit Maranville MGR - Montreal Royals
  25. #134 - Estel Crabtree - Rochester Red Wings
  26. #135 - Phil Weintraub - Rochester Red Wings
Unusual comments
  • #32 Clifton - "Joining the Tigers in 1934." Written for an earlier set and repurposed for this one?
  • #128 - Stevie Stephenson - "He regards Friday the 13th as his lucky day."

Wednesday, June 13, 2018

Cards To See Before You Die, a.k.a. #BucketCards

I tweet about baseball as @Number5TypeCard and, every so often, I post photos of my #BucketCards, specific cardboard that's worth an extra look. Here's my latest, a 1930 minor league 8"x10" premium of "Specs" Toporcer.



Most of these "Cards To See Before You Die" show off something interesting, rare, or artistic. They don't need to be impossible or unaffordable. You could find this Joe Adcock on eBay for a few dollars.



Some #BucketCards put you in a baseball context without showing you baseball players.



Others highlight unconventional shots from a century ago.



I post many shots from the 1920s and 1930s, when companies reinvented each year what it meant to be a "baseball card." Art Deco's just one of many styles they tried.



Even if they "can't all be Waners," at least they're all #BucketCards!

Tuesday, April 17, 2018

Five Whys: 'Selected By The Youth Of America!'

This post follows my History of Topps According to 2016 Anthology, where Topps played loosey goosey with its legacy, nudging a collectors-first story to the forefront and their competitive business decisions to the back. Here's that blurb in full.


Notice how Topps called out the phrase, "Selected by the youth of America," without giving us more to chew on. Are modern collectors expected to know who "Youth of America" refers to? Is it these guys and gals?

Topps Winners proof sheet, via The Topps Archives

(No, that's a group of kids who won a 1971 Topps write-in contest. We need to go older.)

I traveled back to the 1950s to learn more about the "Youth of America" and why Topps highlighted their selection process. This led me to other questions, which led to others still. In all, I asked Five Whys, an approach some businesses take to finding the origins of something you want to know.

1. Why the phrase, "Selected by the youth of America?"

Topps used it on the 1960 All-Star Rookie subset of 10 players, #316-325, which I profiled in 2016. Willie McCovey's its biggest name.

1960 Topps #316

Check out McCovey's 1959 Baseball-Reference game log. He notched a 1.085 OPS and won NL's Rookie of the Year unanimously in just 52 games. Topps printed two 1960 "rookie" cards for Willie, both in subsets: All-Star Rookie #316 (above) and SPORT Magazine '60 All-Star card #554.

Most consider #316 Willie's "real" RC, as it came out in 1960 Topps series four (#287-374, released June-July). His #554 '60 All-Star is a high number from series seven (#507-572, released late in the season).

2. Why was Willie McCovey selected to multiple cardboard "All-Star" teams?

Willie didn't appear in MLB's "real" All Star Game in 1959 or 1960. In fact, McCovey made his first All-Star game three years later, in 1963. So who called him an "All-Star" in 1960?

1960 Topps #554

I'll expand on McCovey's #316 All-Star Rookie selection later in this post. His #554 '60 All-Star Selection proves easier to explain.

SPORT Magazine sponsored the first Topps All-Star subset in 1958, which I believe Topps added to their existing set because they'd signed Stan Musial to a card contract mid-season and wanted to take immediate advantage.

1958 Topps #476

No mainstream Musial cards existed between 1954-57, so 1958's All-Star card satisfied considerable pent-up demand. SPORT magazine chose these '58 All-Star Selections and perhaps also designed the cards, which look quite different from normal 1958 Topps. (See How and Why Topps Created the All-Star Set for more details.)

1959 Topps #561, Hank Aaron

Topps swapped periodical partners for 1959 and The Sporting News sponsored its Rookie Stars and '59 All-Star Selection (above) subsets.

1960 Topps #136, Jim Kaat

SPORT returned to pick lineups for the same 1960 subsets: #117-148 (1960 Rookie Star) and #553-572 ('60 All-Star Selections).

Note this SPORT 1960 Rookie Star subset remains distinct from Topps' own All-Star Rookie Team. That year's set contained two crops of rookies, The Sporting News early in the year (series two) and Topps All-Star Rookies at mid-season (series four).

1960 Topps #317, Pumpsie Green

As I covered in Comparing the Rookie Stars of 1959 and 1960 Topps, just two guys garnered real rookie cards in 1960's subset: Willie McCovey and Pumpsie Green, who broke the Red Sox color barrier. The other eight also appeared in 1959 Topps, so 1960 represented their second card.

So why did Willie McCovey get a second "All-Star" card in 1960? Because Topps dedicated their All-Star subset to SPORT magazine, who picked McCovey to recognize his great play, not because he made NL's All-Star roster.

3. Why didn't All-Star subsets show All-Star starters?

This has more to do with shenanigans that can creep into any voting process. Due to considerable ballot-stuffing by locals prior to 1957's All-Star game in Cincinnati, they claimed top spots at seven NL field positions; all save Stan Musial at 1B were Redlegs.

1959 Topps #1, Ford Frickin' Frick

MLB commissioner Ford Frick took a dim view of this lopsided outcome, with direct consequences for fans and All-Stars. He replaced two of Cincy's outfield starters with Willie Mays and Hank Aaron and removed the public's role in All-Star voting for an unspecified period. Players, managers, and the Commissioner's office, who'd always held a stake in the process, took over full team selection. I think this loss of fan All-Star voting for 1958 "lit the fuse" for what followed.

Baseball's All-Stars magazine, circa 1958, printed by SPORT

The loss of fan voting didn't dampen popular interest in "All-Stars," as the term served both formal and informal meaning for great players. Magazines like SPORT and The Sporting News picked their own All-Star lineups at the start of each year, as in the issue shown above. Being accessible to anyone with 35 cents, they also held bona fides to know who fans liked on the field better than MLB front offices.

Unlike today, 1959-62 saw baseball play two mid-season All-Star games in two different cities, further separating fan voting from the starting nine. Player availability and travel logistics impacted who took the field and Topps just wasn't in the habit (yet) of matching All-Stars on the field to All-Stars on their cards.

1982 Topps #339, Mike Schmidt AS

From our modern perspective, it feels right for All-Star cards to reflect last year's starting lineups. Mike Schmidt started at 3B in the 1981 game, so he's your NL All-Star at that position for 1982 Topps. As mentioned above, that tradition didn't exist in 1960: the Topps mindset seemed to be, let's see the stars of this year, now.

Giving the long hours required to create each year's set, I'm not surprised Topps handed off All-Star subsets to magazine editors at The Sporting News and SPORT. It echoes how similar prewar sets contracted back text to sportswriter Austen Lake (1934-36 National Chicle)...

1936 National Chicle #8, with Austen Lake byline

...and sports agent Christy Walsh, who provided card text under Lou Gehrig's signature for 1934 Goudey.


In summary, why didn't 50s and 60s All-Star cards show All-Star starting lineups? The loss of fan voting after 1957 and complications from multiple All-Star games encouraged Topps to leave everything up to actual baseball writers. Topps first connected on-card "All-Star" text to the prior year starting lineup 15 years later in 1974.

1973 Topps "Missing NL All-Star" Hank Aaron

If you enjoy other All-Star oddities, check out writer Rich Klein's Early 1960s Topps All-Star Mysteries and this Missing All-Stars series from the blog When Topps Had Balls.

Some of their head-scratchers make more sense considering sportswriters chose All-Star rosters, not Topps itself, and they didn't intend to match actual All-Star lineups. I assume writers sometimes picked guys they knew well as a personal favor. After all, "it's just a baseball card!"

4. Why (again) the "Youth of America?"

Soon after the 1957 All-Star voting ban, I think Topps saw the business opportunity to craft its own style of All-Star voting and pump up their Bazooka gum brand. This ballot shows the resulting partnership with NBC-TV's late September's "World Series Special" broadcast, with show details printed in red text.

1959 All-Star Rookie Team ballot (front & back)

Starting around mid-season of 1959, Topps distributed millions of mail-in ballots that asked kids to pick a favorite player and then watch NBC's "World Series Special" on September 29th to see who won. According to September 26's issue of Sponsor, a trade journal for advertisers, Prestone (named on the ballot itself) paid $90,000 to underwrite the 1959 show.

This wasn't Topps' first 1959 gum promo: the one below sold Bazooka Joe shirts! Close inspection of the scan shows the tee shirt insert shares a left edge "notch" with the All-Star Rookie ballot, so would've been packaged by similar equipment. It's logical that the shirt promo started prior to opening day, when baseball interest was lower. All-Star Rookie ballots took over by summertime.

1959 Bazooka tee shirt insert, via Bob Lemke's blog

I think Topps boosted Bazooka gum during 1959 because that's the same year Dubble Bubble maker Fleer cracked into the baseball card market with its own Ted Williams exclusive set.

1959 Fleer Ted Williams wax box and packs

Topps now faced Fleer on two fronts: gum revenue and card revenue. They responded with an on-box set of appealing, full-color cards you could trim off with scissors. By linking baseball to Bazooka and pumping money into its marketing, Topps showed Fleer it was ready to fight both battles. Topps buyers got gum with their cards and Bazooka buyers got a card with their gum.

1959 Bazooka baseball, Mickey Mantle

This sharp set, one player per panel, says it appeals to "Young America" right on the gum box. Given the size match and Bazooka branding, did All-Star Rookie ballots slip into Bazooka boxes as well?

Here's how Topps announced ballot distribution in a July 1959 issue of The Sporting News.


Kudos to Phungo's article about Willie McCovey's 80th birthday and the first All-Star Rookie Team for locating these Sporting News scans about the voting, complete with sample ballot!


Being part of NBC's "World Series Special" broadcast appears to be one Topps goal for their campaign. That list of awards for "Winning Rookies" connects to their second goal, a media-friendly All-Star Rookie Banquet planned for October 29. Let's cover both goals, in that order.


Check out that red text on the back of each ballot. The perennial "World Series Special" show made big money for NBC producers, so I bet Topps saw dollar signs from their year-long role in its advertising and as an "All-Star Rookie" feature of the show itself.

As fate would have it, a tie in 1959's National League standings required a best-of-three playoff between the Braves and Dodgers, so the World Series started later than predicted. I found three newspaper excerpts about that complication and apparent resolution.

LA Times, Sept 26, 1959: "NBC has set a World Series special for Tuesday at 9:30PM. Martin Stone, the producer, is having fits now that the National League race could end in a play-off, setting the Series back a couple of days. NBC had lined up an expensive show, but it may never happen. This thing is giving everybody fits."

Jack Brickhouse, longtime Chicago broadcaster (photo by WGN)

Chicago Tribune, Sept 28: "JACK BRICKHOUSE will interview fans waiting in line for World Series bleacher tickets [for the White Sox] on NBC-TV's World Series Special at 8:30PM Tuesday. The show will include interviews with managers and players, and highlights of the pennant races in both leagues."

Lowell Sun, Sept 29: "WORLD SERIES SPECIAL, with Mel Allen; host, sportscasters Jack Brickhouse, Howard Cosell, Vince Scully, Lindsey Nelson; former Dodger star Roy Campanella; stars of the White Sox; National league stars [of] the 1959 All-Star Rookie team." [my emphasis]

Tie those pieces together and it seems NBC worked things out to broadcast World Series Special as planned, complete with some All-Star Rookies. NL selections McCovey, Joe Koppe, and Jim O'Toole seem our best candidates for that broadcast.

UPDATE: Dave Hornish of The Topps Archives shared this World Series Special promotional coin for a Giants vs. White Sox matchup, implying Prestone's show producers created it prior to SF's late September swoon that handed a pennant playoff to LA and Milwaukee.


As of this update, you can find that anachronism on eBay for a cool $80!

Calling them the "First Annual" awards is classic Topps chutzpah

Topps' second successful end goal of all this balloting? The inaugural All-Star Rookie Banquet, held in NYC's Manhattan Hotel on October 29. Topps claimed they received 1.7 million mailed ballots. Eight of the ten rookies pictured on 1960 Topps cards attended, all but Jim O'Toole and Willie Tasby.

Sporting News team photo from Phungo's article

Former catcher (and future HOF broadcaster) Joe Garagiola hosted the proceedings. Given the pleasant tone of its New York Times news coverage, attendees had a good enough time that they decided to do it again in the future.

This, in the end, is why Topps said the "youth of America" selected their 1960 All-Star Rookie team.

5. Why didn't the "Youth of America" select All-Star Rookies every year?

Willie McCovey garnered most of 1959 banquet's event coverage, so I expect he also received the most mail-in votes. Jackie Robinson, now in business, led the 1959 advisory committee charged with tabulating and announcing the results. He served in that capacity for several years, since he's still listed on my 1964 banquet #5 type card.

1964 Topps All-Star Banquet #5, Election Committee

Topps continued to insert ballots into 1960 wax packs, again under the Bazooka mailing address. Thanks to The Topps Archives article Programs! Get Your Programs Here! for this scan.


Here's a 1960 Topps All-Star Rookie and future Hall of Famer, #35 Ron Santo. I believe he's part of the last crop voted for by the "youth of America."


Why would 1960 be the last year? Consider why a committee of marketing men would grapple with 1.7 million votes. Bob Lemke's "30 million wax pack inserts went 'poof'" article lists that group, circa 1959.
  • Tim Cohane, sports editor, Look magazine
  • Dan Ferris, honorary secretary, National Amateur Athletic Union
  • Ed Fitzgerald, editor-in-chief, SPORT magazine
  • Frank Frisch, Hall of Famer
  • Tom S. Gallery, director of sports, NBC
  • Dave Grote, public relations director, National League
  • Sid James, managing editor, Sports Illustrated
  • Carl Lundquist, public relations director, Natl Assn. of Professional Baseball Leagues
  • Bill MacPhail, director of sports, CBS
  • Joe McKenney, public relations director, American League
  • Jackie Robinson, vice-president, Chock Full O'Nuts
  • Marshall Smith, sports editor, Life magazine
  • J.G. Taylor Spink, publisher, The Sporting News

Given that committee's density of public relations and media muscle, I think Topps' 1959-60 All-Star Rookie effort proved their marketing clout to both print and television partners. After 1960, they no longer needed to pay for ballot inserts. They'd solidified a durable relationship with pro baseball, advertisers, and sportswriters during a transformative time for baseball itself.

"Sports Briefs," Madera Tribune, Oct 7, 1965

This 1965 newspaper blurb referenced 578 total All-Star Rookies votes, which strikes me as a combo of willing players, scouts, coaches, and/or sportswriters. (1965 also happens to be the year Topps regained its exclusive right to print MLB cards, after the Federal Trade Commission reversed a 1964 ruling that would've allowed more competition.)

1960 Fleer Baseball Greats box and wax packs

Speaking of competition, what did Fleer do after 1959? Fleer followed its Ted Williams-only set with this Baseball Greats set in 1960. Ted appeared as its sole active player, surrounded by legends, former greats, and off-field executives.


1961-62 Fleer Baseball Greats box panel

Williams retired after 1960, making Fleer the first to publish this "all retired" set, a somewhat dubious distinction, across 1961 and 1962. They tried to publish a full set of active players in 1963, before being stopped by legal action from Topps after just 66 cards.

Bazooka shrunk their single-card size starting in 1960, giving them space for three players per box panel. Topps continued to run Bazooka baseball sets through 1970, well after Fleer lost their legal fight to stay in the baseball market.

1961 Bazooka box panels

Remember that this whole Topps business opportunity started with the conceit that Ford Frick removed fan All-Star voting for 1958, which led to Topps creating the SPORT All-Star subset, which led to fan mail-in voting for Topps All-Star Rookies, which led to All-Star Rookie Teams that continue to this day.

At last, we know who the "Youth of America" were, how they voted for their selections, and why Topps set up the whole thing to start with. It's amazing to me that this Topps marketing phrase, pulled from 1950s Bazooka gum packs, proved durable enough to stick around into the 21st century.

BONUS CONTENT: THE VENEZUELA-CUBA CONNECTION

Topps didn't just spend 1959 starting new revenue streams in the good ol' USA; they also partnered with South American publisher Industrias Benco to print a debut Venezuelan baseball set.

1959-60 Venezuelan #96, Lou Berberet

Benco's set replicated Topps' first two series, #1-198, on cheaper paper stock and with no protective surface gloss. They sold packs during Venezuela's winter league season, which runs October to January (more league history at Wikipedia). (I think Venezuelan sets should be tagged "1959-60" because their league season spanned two years, so makes more sense to treat like basketball or hockey sets.)

This repurposed 1959 set added a local touch to existing Topps practices for the 1950s, where the Brooklyn company shipped unsold cards south each autumn for sale to baseball-happy Venezuelan fans. Check out The Topps Archives article, Where Have You Gone, Dom DiMaggio?, for some great research and lingering questions about the fate of 1952's infamous high numbers.

If you're a fan of history or geopolitics, you might remember another baseball-related thing that happened in 1959: Fidel Castro came to power in Cuba.


It's hard to overstate the impact Castro's regime had on winter league baseball and America's relationship to it. To compress years of international action into a few sentences, Havana's image as the Western Hemisphere's casino-and-gangster party town presented an easy target for socialist change. Baseball owners used Cuba as a winter base of operations beyond American law, so felt considerable pain when Castro suspended its professional league following his rise to power. Dozens of star players left Cuba to seek paydays, flooding winter leagues of nearby countries. On the political front, America's revulsion at socialism just 90 miles from Florida sent MLB teams scrambling away from financial association with existing Cuban teams and partners.

Due in part to the influx of Cuban winter league "immigrants," Venezuela even canceled its 1959-60 postseason series. Hard to know what impact this had on the season's card market. I imagine Benco distributed and sold its 198 cards as best they could.

However 1959-60's set turned out, Topps continued to license their images for Venezuela printing and sale during 1960-61, 1962-63, 1964-65, and 1966-67 winter league seasons. Local sets made after 1967 strike me as too amateurish to be done with Topps involvement.

There's much we don't (or can't?) know about the history of Venezuelan sets and distribution. Given their multitude of 1959 efforts stateside, it appears Topps added this one more business deal overseas, perhaps to avoid complications with Cuba's new political climate.

IS THERE ANYTHING TOPPS DIDN'T DO IN 1959?

I'm starting to think they didn't dump 1952 high numbers into the ocean! But why get mired in a complicated truth, when an "aw shucks, we should have known better" story will do? :-)

Monday, March 12, 2018

One for Five : The History of Topps According to 2016 Anthology

Today post follows the spirit of a pair of posts from spring 2016 and give you a head-start on the evolving business of 1950s Topps baseball sets. Feel free to check those out first.

Modern card collectors will know Topps often revisits their past glory with Heritage sets, vintage reprints, throwback inserts, and so forth. Back in 2016, Topps beefed up this tradition by releasing a Topps Anthology series that reprinted many significant baseball cards from their past on pricy, postcard-sized (5"x7") paper in boxed albums.

2016 Topps Anthology, 1951 - 2016

The marketing blurb accompanying Anthology gave me pause, as it mixed facts and errors in pursuit of a kitchen-to-castle story of Topps baseball and the collecting market in general.

2016 Topps Anthology Series One marketing poster

How well did Topps compact their decades of hobby history into two paragraphs? Not great.

Error #1: "...started producing baseball trading cards in 1951..." is three years off.

1948 Topps Magic Photo, George Sisler

Topps first printed baseball cards in 1948 with the sepia-toned Magic Photo set. Today, you'll find type cards on eBay for low money, $10 or less. Magic Photo's gimmicky and ugly as sin, so I don't blame Topps for pretending they never happened.

Fact: "...Sy Berger designed the standard-setting cards at his kitchen table..." 

Sy Berger, 1952 style

Sy Berger garnered a great deal of credit for creating the 1952 set and it sold well, forcing other card makers to play catch-up in both design and set size. Did Sy design this seminal set at his kitchen table? Sure, why not! I'm writing this post at my kitchen table. It's comfortable and it's where the food is.

Error: "By '74...rookie cards are more valued than ever."

That's somewhat true...and yet misleading. First-year rookies didn't drop in value before 1974, so their value was indeed "more than ever." Circa 1974, premium pricing in the hobby went to stars and rarity far more than prospects and rookies. That held true until cards like this came along.

1981 Donruss #538, Tim Raines RC

Unless my memory's faulty, the mania for rookies didn't blow up until Topps' competitors Fleer and Donruss arrived in 1981 and all three looked for ways to outsell and out-promote each other. Tim Raines and Fernando Valenzuela drove high demand in 1981 itself, where Donruss was the only set to put Tim on his own card and Fleer was the only set for Fernando's own card.

1985 Topps #401, Mark McGwire RC

Remember Mark McGwire's 1985 Topps rookie card? People went nuts for it in 1986, when he broke the rookie HR record. This hobby-changer happened because Topps licensed cards for the 1984 Olympics team (made up of college players) as a way to undercut Fleer and Donruss. Anthology misses the "mark" a bit when it pushes rookies-as-savvy-investments back to the 1970s, to when local, informal pricing defined the hobby over annual price guides. (Lest this sound like a critique, I think centralized pricing helped the hobby mature and we'd still be wandering the desert without it.)

Error: "...first Traded series in late '74..." 


Topps introduced Traded in their last series of 1972 baseball by airbrushing players into post-trade uniforms, like #751 Steve Carlton going from St. Louis to Philly. Why introduce this subset in 1972 and not sooner? I credit the early stages of MLB free agency, which promoted freer movement of players. Topps hoped these up-to-date cards sold during pennant races would give fans a reason to keep buying packs in the late season months.

Error: "...stacking [1974 Traded] with rookies called up from the minors..."

1974 Topps Traded, a 44 card late-season insert set

Traded cards in 1974 feature airbrushed players who'd been traded, same as 1972. They did much the same with another Traded set in 1976. No rookies to be seen!


If what you want is vets in new uniforms and rookie phenoms, Topps first offered that in 1981 as Topps "Traded," a tidy boxed set that added 132 cards to the existing regular set, #727-858. As mentioned earlier, this kind of release followed new competition from Fleer and Donruss.

Before 1981, Topps took just three, low-quality shots at "traded" players in 1972, 1974, and 1976. Starting in 1981, they made the Traded series an appealing, annual look at fresh faces and new jerseys. To tie back to my early note about Tim Raines and Fernando Valenzuela, one could argue they created 1981's Traded set as a hedge against innovations Fleer and Donruss would release and hot players they'd miss out on.

.200, The Mendoza Line

How'd they measure up? Topps went 1-for-5 on their own history, batting just .200! I'm a little disappointed, given how easy it is to check these details via Google.

Why do I care in the 21st century about how Topps characterized their first quarter century? Because there's a business history that runs parallel to their baseball history. The financial decisions that Topps made in those years enabled them to create all those great 1950s and 1960s cards that became part of Anthology and I want that business history to be just as visible to hobbyists, even if it risks making the baseball side feel less magical.

And I'm not done with you yet, Anthology ad copy!


For my next post, I'll dive deeper into the phrase, "Selected by the youth of America." Anthology didn't give us more to chew on and, as it turns out, there's plenty of meat on that bone. What should modern collectors know about who the "Youth of America" were? How does it relate to collecting today? More to come soon.